Summary: Content strategy is not just about ranking on Google anymore. With generative AI tools exploding in usage, writers need to create content that works for both search engines and AI systems. That means you still hold on to the old SEO basics, but you also adjust a little for how AI works. Things like giving clear summaries, laying out information in a simple question-and-answer style, keeping your brand name consistent wherever it shows up, and stating key facts in plain language. It is almost like you are running two different races at once. Google feels more like a long marathon, and AI is more like a fast sprint.
Why Ranking on Google Alone Won’t Be Enough Anymore
I have been staring at this question for a while: how do you even write content now? For years, the formula was simple. Rank on Google, show up on page one, job done. But things are not that neat anymore. AI chatbots don’t just point people to links; they become the answer.
Search vs AI: where people are actually looking
Google is still the king. No doubt about that. Stats back it up. But those numbers only count traditional search engines. What about the growing crowd of people who just ask ChatGPT or another bot? Different story.
Here’s the thing. Chatbot traffic is still way smaller compared to Google. But the speed it is growing is hard to ignore. One study showed visits exploding by 80 percent in a year. ChatGPT alone pulled in 55.2 billion visits in 12 months. That’s not nothing. And while these tools don’t exactly replace search yet, they are definitely carving out space.
You can’t just write for Google anymore. You have to write for Google and the bots.
How search engines think vs how AI thinks
This is where it gets interesting.
Google looks simple from the outside: type a keyword, get a list of links. But under the hood, it is a spider web of algorithms. Relevance, authority, backlinks, trust, structured data, and even reviews. Honestly, it’s a machine built over decades to weed out cheats. Penguin, Panda, Farmer, all those updates, they killed shortcuts.
AI flips the whole thing. People feed it long, messy prompts. AI spits out polished answers. But the defense system behind it is not as hardened as Google’s. AI doesn’t check thousands of signals. It leans on fewer sources, and it values mentions, co-citations, as much as or sometimes more than actual links. That changes the game.
Instead of obsessing over backlinks, you could benefit just from being mentioned in the right places. Almost like old-school PR making a comeback, but tuned for machines.
Hence, how do we actually write for both?
Here’s where I keep going back and forth. Part of me thinks nothing’s really changed. Good content is still good content. Clear structure, headings, facts, stats, clean code, accessible pages. Google loves it. AI eats it up, too.
However, there are also additional layers. Write in Q and format because AI users ask questions, not just keywords. Keep summaries sharp because AI pulls those lines straight into answers. Don’t bury important info in PDFs or behind scripts. AI’s not as smart as Google when crawling. Ensure your brand appears consistently everywhere. AI blends stuff, so mixed signals confuse it. And think about co-citations, getting your brand mentioned next to the right terms in the right places.
What hits me is that AI is not replacing SEO. It is like parallel SEO. Similar rules, slightly different mechanics. Ignore it, and you miss half the future traffic.
Where this leaves us
The takeaway is that writing for both is not impossible. In fact, it is mostly overlapping. The difference is in the details. Short, sharp facts for AI, structured depth for Google. Both want clarity, authority, and trust.
The tricky part is keeping up with the speed of change. Google took more than twenty years to get where it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment